|
It's Not Magic, It's the Asset Class
by Paul
A. Merriman
Publisher and Editor
Some small-cap funds have been attracting a lot of attention lately with
eye-popping performance. Some have closed their doors to new investors, and some
small-value fund managers have reached guru status. Brilliant stock-picking is
always valuable in an actively managed fund. Awful stock picking can turn an
otherwise good fund into a disaster. But in most cases, the success or failure
of the asset class explains the success or failure of the fund.
From 1995 through 2001, the smallest 20 percent of U.S. stocks, measured by
market capitalization, produced five years of double-digit returns and two years
of single-digit losses.
Indeed, $10,000 invested on December 31, 1994 in the DFA US Micro-Cap Fund
(DFSCX) would have grown to $29,518 by the end of May 2002. That’s an
annualized return of about 15.6 percent.
For comparison, $10,000 in the DFA US Large Company Fund (DFLCX) also had
five double-digit calendar year gains and two losses, starting in 1995. But
those large-cap losses were more recent and larger. In addition, this large-cap
fund was down 6.6 percent in the first five months of 2002. An investment of
$10,000 in this fund would have grown to $25,900 by the end of May, for an
annualized return of 13.5 percent.
Many investors have a strong desire to keep things simple. Some believe a
small-cap fund is a small-cap fund is a small-cap fund. Wrong! Within the
small-cap universe, there are important distinctions that can make big
differences in performance. The biggest distinction is between growth and value,
as shown in the following table. Year-to-date figures are through June 11.
|
|
2002 year to date
|
Five years
|
|
Russell 2000 Index
|
(4.8)
|
9.5
|
|
Russell 2000 Growth Index
|
(15.7)
|
4.8
|
|
Russell 2000 Value Index
|
5.5
|
13.3
|
Those numbers should help explain the returns of many individual small-cap
funds. The following table shows returns through June 11 for a selection of
small-cap funds, some of which we use in our Model Portfolios and our privately
managed accounts. Each fund is identified by a letter in parentheses indicating
whether its portfolio is oriented toward growth (G) or value (V).
The table also includes Lipper mutual fund averages for small-cap growth
funds and small-cap value funds. (Note that some of these funds are closed to
new investors.)
|
Ticker
|
Fund
|
2002 through June 11
|
|
VEXPX
|
Vanguard Explorer (G)
|
down 10.8%
|
|
FDSCX
|
Fidelity Small Cap Independence (G)
|
down 1.9%
|
|
FIEGX
|
Invesco Small Company Growth (G)
|
down 16.8%
|
|
PBEGX
|
PBHG Emerging Growth (G)
|
down 32.9%
|
|
BGRFX
|
Baron Growth (G)
|
up 2.5%
|
|
WBSNX
|
Wm. Blair Small Cap Growth (G)
|
down 5.5%
|
|
ACRNX
|
Liberty Acorn Z (G)
|
down 2.3%
|
|
|
Lipper small growth average
|
down 12.8%
|
|
TASCX
|
Third Avenue Small Cap Value (V)
|
up 0.4%
|
|
FLPSX
|
Fidelity Low Price Stock (V)
|
up 7.3%
|
|
OAKSX
|
Oakmark Small Cap (V)
|
up 4.7%
|
|
ASVIX
|
Am. Century Small Cap Value (V)
|
up 3.7%
|
|
WMCVX
|
Wasatch Small Cap Value (V)
|
up 11.0%
|
|
PRSVX
|
T. Rowe Price Small Cap Value (V)
|
up 8.3%
|
|
DFSVX
|
DFA Small Cap Value (V)
|
up 8.0%
|
|
|
Small value category average
|
up 3.4%
|
Although there’s quite a range of returns within each style of small-cap
investing, the difference between growth and value is obvious in this short
period. Every small-cap value fund on the list was up. Only one small-cap growth
fund in this group was up.
I think the lesson is clear: When the wind is behind you, you don’t have to
be a world-class sailor to look good.
Source: http://www.fundadvice.com
|
Link to this article, just copy and paste following code:
<a href=http://www.investador.com/article229.html>It's Not Magic, It's the Asset Class</a>
|
Article viewed 724 time(s). Read more: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|